Sepahi Law Group, APC

Business Trial Lawyers

"I recommend Sage for whoever is in need of a knowledgeable and effective attorney. I ran into some issues with my partners when trying to dissolve a corporation. I retained Sage to help me through the process and I couldn't be happier with the results. Sage communicated very effectively with the other side and protected my assets completely in the process. His rates are extremely fair for the results you will get. You won't regret having Sage in your corner. "

Andrew

Call us today:

858. 465. 9206

fb twitter linkdin rss contact
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Attorneys
    • Sage S. Sepahi
  • Practice Areas
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Business Litigation
    • Corporate Formation
    • Business Dissolution
    • Employment Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Confidentiality of the Arbitration Process

January 29, 2015 by Sage Sepahi

Many companies and individuals prefer arbitration to litigation because arbitration is considered to be more private. When you litigate a dispute, the court room may be open to the public and anyone can attend the hearings. The press may write about interesting business disputes and include details from the court hearings. The evidence presented at trial also becomes part of court records and may be accessible to the public.  While it is possible to request a closed trial or a “gag order” to try to keep the details of litigation private, there is no guarantee that these options will be available to you. Shhh

Arbitration, on the other hand, can be conducted at closed meetings attended only by the arbitrator and the parties to the disagreement. It is possible to keep the public out and even to prevent news of the arbitration from becoming widely available. The process of arbitration is determined by agreement of the parties, so you can negotiate an arbitration procedure that places a premium on privacy. However, while arbitration is generally private, the confidentiality of the arbitration process is not necessarily guaranteed.

The Confidentiality of the Arbitration Process

Arbitration clauses in contracts may specify how arbitration is to take place. These contracts can attempt to guarantee the confidentiality of the arbitration process. The arbitration can be scheduled to occur at a private location and can exclude anyone from the proceeding who is not a part of the dispute.  The arbitration process can also specify that the dispute and resolution should be kept confidential.

The parties can negotiate and agree on these terms when first beginning their business relationship or entering into a transaction and signing a contract. They can also agree on the terms of the process for arbitration at the time when a disagreement arises. In many cases, unfortunately, arbitration clauses are found in take-it-or-leave it contracts in which a company has created a contract and a consumer can either sign it and accept its terms or walk away. This means that an individual signing an arbitration agreement may not really have the ability to negotiate on the issue of the confidentiality of the arbitration process.

Even when a contract specifying confidentiality is signed, or when the disputing parties agree to keep the arbitration quiet, there is still no guarantee that there will not be public information shared. Witnesses may not agree to maintain confidentiality, and enforcing agreements promising secrecy are difficult to enforce.

In a 2001 California case, Foxgate Homeowners’ Ass’n, Inc. v. Bramalea California, Inc., the court ruled: “[T]here are no exceptions to the confidentiality of mediation communications…. Neither a mediator nor a party may reveal communications made during mediation.”  However, the rules for arbitration may not be so clear cut. In fact, in numerous cases, the courts have decided that confidentiality clauses were unconscionable.  In a 2003 case called Ting v. AT&T, for example, the court ruled that the confidentiality clause was unconscionable (and thus not enforceable) because AT&T was able to accumulate knowledge as it arbitrated disputes while its potential opponents did not have any access to precedent.

Confidentiality clauses in arbitration are not always unconscionable in California according to Davis v. O’Melveny & Myers, but it is important that they are written carefully so as not to be overly broad.

An experienced San Diego business lawyer will help you to explore options for maintaining the confidentiality of the arbitration process. Call today to schedule a consultation and learn more.

About Sage Sepahi

Sage Sepahi provides business litigation, class action litigation, employment litigation, real estate litigation, civil right litigation, commercial litigation, corporate formation, business dissolution, and arbitration/mediation services to residents of San Diego city and county, La Jolla, and Del Mar.

How Can We Help?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Testimonials

  • Business Client

    I appreciate the friendliness and the prompt response I would receive from him. I would definitely recommend Mr. Sepahi he is very knowledgeable in what he does and I wouldn't hesitate to use his service again. I had a really good experience working with him.

  • Daniel

    I am also an attorney in San Diego. I needed a business law attorney to assist me with a very complex matter. As I have been an attorney in family law for 9 years, I did not even know where to start in looking for a business attorney. I was informed about Sage Sepahi who had an excellent representation in Northern California. I was a bit nervous about using someone new to San Diego, but I couldn't have been happier. I got a six figure settlement and am very pleased. He knows business law like the back of his hand and was great. I would never use anybody else and find he was extremely professional and always returned calls and emails.

  • Steve

    I hired Sage a couple years ago to step into a case that my previous lawyers had managed to screw up. From the moment Sage took over my case things changed. He understood the complex issues I was dealing with created an effective strategy that allowed us to prevail on every significant aspect of the case. I hired Sage during a very stressful time in my life and it was one of the best decisions I ever made. Being a business owner for the past 25 years, I have dealt with many attorneys who view you as a quick and easy way to make a buck. Sage is the exact opposite of this- highly ethical and trustworthy. I can't thank Sage enough and he will be the first person I call when another issue presents itself.

  • BT

    Sage has represented me in a variety of legal matters including business disputes, transactional matters and employee conflicts. Sage is a great communicator and his ability to prevent legal problems before they arise. He is among the best attorneys I have worked with. I highly recommend Sage.

  • Matthew

    Attorney Sage Sepahi is simply the best! Sage came highly recommended by one of my clients who was in a similar situation as I was with his business partners. He took on a tough case for me and I was very happy with the results. He goes out of his way to ensure you are kept up-to-date on the status of your case to the end. I would definitely recommend Sage if you are looking for a honest, efficient and knowledgeable attorney. Thank you Sage!

© 2014 Sepahi Law Group APC.
All Rights Reserved.

Mailing address:
P.O. Box 2608
Del Mar, CA 92014
+1 858. 465. 9206

logo2

Connect to us:

fbf ttf linkdinf rssf mailf
Website Powered by Best Legal Practices |
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

.

Copyright © 2021 · Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in